FRAUD, where did it begin
a podcast...
FRAUD, where did it begin?
In the following video I delve into some legal theories and postulations backed by legal precedent, along with historical reflections.
In my book, "Quantum of Justice", we dig deep into the world of fraud exposing the corrupt nature of the non-judicial foreclosure process and our corrupt judicial systems that we must rely on.
In this podcast, "Fraud?" takes us all on a different legal journey. We could say that we were using this video as a premise to "argue in the alternative" in order to formulate our entire cause of action. What is necessary to understand is the fact that there are multitudes of layers of fraud and corruption in the world of Wall Street, Securitizations, Mortgage Backed Securities, and much more. In this essay we look at a few legal angles that have plagued our country and continue to this day. We will have a good look into the argument of RICO charges as well as, the need to hold the top level executives to the legal limits.
I welcome you to share this with your friends and colleagues. Let’s beging the conversations that are necessary to make the needed changes so many wish to see in the world.
BUY “QUANTUM OF JUSTICE” FOR YOUR HOLIDAY GIFT GIVING TODAY!
Well, Michael, it certainly has been a few years since our last series of exchanges. Perhaps you have forgotten, but I already have your email and phone numbers from those.
First I will make note that you are correct in that I could have used a different word in this essay than “bankruptcy”. I understand and admit that that word was used for the theatre of the point and misguided. You are not the first person to point that out. Bankruptcy has a series of true action items that the process entails of which the country did not go through, and in all actuality it never would. The reasons for this is that our government has the right to create money, therefore the idea that it can go bankrupt is totally false. However, I was using the word as effect and it was not correct. I had already begun working on a re-write of this post of which I will be correcting that issue and going into more depth.
I am working on that with Steve Grumbine, the known Modern Monetary Theory podcaster from RealProgressives.com and the respected podcasts “Mac n Cheese”, “The New Untouchables”, and others on his platform which he founded. It was on that platform with The New Untouchables, which I am a founding member of, where I met and first worked with him. You will find a podcast which I was a guest on with The New Untouchables in season 2, along with noted paralegal Paris Dube and our interview together with Steve Grumbine and Patrick Lovell.
It’s actually a bit of a funny story, because you brought up your deep respect for the documentary film, THE CON. You express the detail and expertise of the work of the producer, who you mentioned that you know. I am very familiar with this film and have seen it a few times indeed. I agree whole heartedly that it is an amazing piece of work. I have been friends with the producer of the film, Patrick Lovell, for a handful of years, but you couldn’t have known that. We have been in conversation and exchanging ideas for years before his film was completed and before my book was finished. We stay in frequent communication and continue to work the process of exposing the corruption of the law, its lawyers and judges and others that are associated with Wall Street, politics and our judicial systems that are so broken. In fact, Patrick, was kind enough to show his deep respect for my work and my book that he wrote the Foreword to it. You can look that up or buy my book. Here is a link:
https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Justice-Foreclosure-Illegal-Securitization-ebook/dp/B09H3TVZ7G/ref=sr_1_1?crid=25DXB61QR9XWH&keywords=quantum+of+justice+book&qid=1639338438&sprefix=Quantum+of+j%2Caps%2C225&sr=8-1
I have stated numerous times, in my book, on my blog and other platforms to which I have written or been a guest speaker on that I am not an attorney. But, then neither are you. Your disbarment should be noted so that people don’t follow up with you for legal advice either. Here are a some links for people if they choose to follow up on that, too:
https://www.calbarjournal.com/April2011/TopHeadlines/TH4.aspx
https://fraudstoppers.org/disbarred-attorney-michael-pines-fraud-warning-alert/
https://www.mcall.com/sdut-former-foreclosure-attorney-probation-violation-2014feb10-story.html
https://casetext.com/case/pines-v-dir-of-atascadero-state-hosp
This is my blog and platform and I have decided to set this up in that I want clarity to make sure that people are given the full story. My whole premise of this blog was to expose ideas in ways that we are able to view both sides to concepts, theories and ideas. So, transparency is paramount in order that people be given both sides of a point or conversation.
I stated earlier that law is interpretive. It is through this process that interpretation can create both positive and negative changes and connotations to the rule of law and precedent. When you add capitalism to the world of law, in all of its places, you get corrupt and greedy lawyers, judges, lobbyists and politicians.
As per your comment about “fiat” currency I am well aware of the fact and could have worded some of the essay differently in that I do know that gold was taken out of our monetary system as it’s backing during the Nixon administration. I have written of that previously on my first blog, which you have visited and we have discussed extensively before.
As I said, I am doing a re-write of this post, and will also do a re-recording of the podcast that I did, as well. I am doing it this was in order to show that I understand that no one is perfect. We all can learn from new information and, as a writer and published author of the book “Quantum of Justice” I am well aware that words are powerful. I do not claim to be an expert at law, however, my experience as a Pro Per litigant against Wells Fargo Bank, and my level of curiosity and research to detail is shown in my book.
I am proud of the work I have created with “Quantum of Justice” and what is transpiring. It is being well received and respected. I am proud to have had Patrick write the Foreword to my work. I am proud to have my work read and reviewed by practicing licensed attorneys across the country. Some of them even quote some of my work in their case files in their State Supreme Court filings.
I have also been asked to speak in front of the International Bar Association this coming year. We are currently working on the date for this discussion and I will certainly make note of this as soon as the date is solid.
This all makes me proud to say the least.
OMG. SORRY DOUG, I CAN'T LISTEN TO ANYMORE. YOU COMPLETELY SAY THE WRONG THINGS ABOUT SECURITIZATION, FRAUD, COUNTERFITTING , FORGERYS, LOST DOCUMENTS AND EVERYTHING ELSE. I suspect you lost your own case as a "pro per" and filed ridiculous things. Read about the law on Neil Garfields site please. It is complex. You completely misstate the cases you cite and the statutes. Briefly, for one thing there is evidence that many of the promissory notes were destroyed. The Notes and Deeds of Trust were both supposed to be "assigned" and recorded as you mentioned. They were not, which is what gave rise to "robo-signing" which is crucial to understand. You also must understand the role of the infamous "MERS" (Mortgage Electronic Registration System). You also confuse "judicial foreclosure" and what happens in court and "non-judicial foreclosures" which you mention in your promotion materials. YOU ARE THE TYPICAL PERSON WHO IS NOT A LAWYER, DOES NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING ABOUT THE LAW, AND FILED THINGS IN COURT AND NOW WROTE A BOOK WHICH IS COMPLETELY WRONG. YOU ARE DOING GREAT HARM.
I suggest you ask me questions. magicalmichael2000@gmail.com and maybe we can talk on the phone.
However, as I tried to tell you since virtually everything that cash flows is "securitized" and illegal nothing can be done without crashing the whole system. Judges know what is going on but are part of the system and don't want it to fail which is why they don't rule in favor of homeowners. So sadly, your book will do no good.